水一个，看吧里讨论川普讨论的沸沸扬扬的我也来凑个热闹。大部分都是图，再加上自己的一点瞎jb评论，不喜勿喷。

先上个national review两月十五号那刊的截图，终于发声要against trump了，他们自己也说这个决定还可能倒过来帮trump的忙，但杂志就是杂志，不发表观点怎么行是吧？

这里是national review里的一则小评：

某川最近相当拿手的另外一点就是自诩为外交大师，稳如sort of a neutral guy：

我们敬爱的罗姆尼同志更是抽脸抽的啪啪响：
There is a dark irony in his boasts of his sexual exploits during the Vietnam War. While at the same time, John McCain, whom he has mocked, was imprisoned and tortured.
Dishonesty is Donald Trump’s hallmark. He claimed that he had spoken clearly and boldly against going into Iraq.
Wrong. He spoke in favor of invading Iraq. He said he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey celebrating 9/11.
Wrong. He saw no such thing. He imagined it. He’s not of the temperament of the kind of stable, thoughtful person we need as a leader. His imagination must not be married to real power. The president of the United States has long been the leader of the free world.
The president and, yes, even the nominees of the country’s great parties helped define America to billions of people around the world. All of them bear the responsibility of being an example for our children and our grandchildren.
Think of Donald Trump’s personal qualities. The bullying, the greed, the showing off, the misogyny, the absurd third grade theatrics. You know, we have long referred to him as “The Donald.” He’s the only person in the entire country to whom we have added an article before his name, and it was not because he had attributes we admired.
(LAUGHTER)
Now, imagine your children and your grandchildren acting the way he does. Would you welcome that? Haven’t we seen before what happens when people in prominent positions fail the basic responsibility of honorable conduct? We have. And it always injures our families and our country.
Watch, by the way, how he responds to my speech today.
Will he talk about our policy differences? Or will he attack me with every imaginable low road insult? This may tell you what you need to know about his temperament, his stability and his suitability to be president.
事后果真被罗姆尼说中，某川像个小学僧一样回击了。

接下来就是移民，某川一开始的立场可是硬得很，非法移民全部送走，别人说不行，他说为毛不行？老子当了总统想干就干。到后来他就神不知鬼不觉的把自己的全部遣返出国改成了touch back policy，从遣返没话说一下子变成了“我把你们先送出去，你们到了国境外落了脚我立马把你们带回来”。果真是当选民都是瞎的，但可怕的是，很多川普的支持者的眼睛的确是瞎的。
还有就是他的大卖点墨西哥长城，一开始就说要建，还让墨西哥付钱，墨西哥前总统说老子他妈不建你的长城，结果某川说好你这话一出来长城又高了10英尺。可笑的是这话一出来还真有死忠当真欢呼喝彩的，到后来还不是舔着脸承认在长城高度问题上自己相当的“flexible”。
一开始某川建长城的口号就是让墨西哥付钱，怎么付呢他就是不说，次次采访次次辩论就是在自己的老三样上翻来覆去打滚就是给不出个切实计划，最近他开始有进步了，学会出组合拳了，把贸易政策跟移民政策连起来讲，他说墨西哥贸易欠了咱们这么多钱，咱们就用它欠的钱来逼他们造长城。

LZ你支持谁呢？

罗姆尼同志依然有话要说：
Mr. Trump is directing our anger for less than noble purposes. He creates scapegoats of Muslims and Mexican immigrants. He calls for the use of torture. He calls for killing the innocent children and family members of terrorists. He cheers assaults on protesters. He applauds the prospect of twisting the Constitution to limit First Amendment freedom of the press.
This is the very brand of anger that has led other nations into the abyss.
折磨俘虏折磨家人也是某川最近的新看点，引得舆论沸沸扬扬，但还有一大批人纷纷叫好的也是看不懂啊看不懂。
人家national review也看不懂：

Glenn Beck对某川的评论：


：

最后随便来一点杂谈：
、
当初电视上一看到这个sarah palin就不爽，站在台上咋咋呼呼跟演小品似的，她跟某川倒是绝配。

还记得trump在辩论里谈到建长城的时候，rubio一句嘲讽引得满堂喝彩：“你就算是建长城你也都是用非法移民建的。”，一句话噎的某川说不出话来。

National review一句话说得好啊：We wish Trump talk this much about the size of his government.

Ted Cruz 和Rubio两个人都是很有竞争力的候选人，一个退选一个落后，他俩相同点很多：保守派，坚定，年轻，有活力，有辩才，生猛，而且都有移民背景。但是cruz是一个establishment很不喜欢的角色，踏进了华盛顿之后就一直四处宣扬参议院众议院共和党人占着多数位置不干正事，在茶党运动搞得沸沸扬扬的时候cruz是个领头人物，在这次竞选里cruz也是照样挑剔所谓“华盛顿卡特尔”的种种不是。
Rubio就是个不一样的角色，他进了参议院以后积极参与党内事务，和McConnel合作密切，也积极与对面的民主党沟通，虽然最后沟通出来一个八人帮是个黑点，但总的来说rubio是一个很成熟的政治家，很讨党内高层喜欢的角色

现在风向不对啊，被贴上establishment标签的布什rubio一个个倒在竞选途中，民众不好惹是真的。但华盛顿有问题也是真的，大家发火胡乱投也不是没道理