3号炮座：

求大神解惑

不合适。主炮塔需要重装甲，座圈装甲更要加厚。如果三重背负，座圈重量太大，重心高稳性不好，只能当近海浮炮台用。

骚年你需要一星期的炮塔

你不在乎重心的话可以，毕竟不在乎重心的设计师也不是没有
战列舰的炮塔是有厚重装甲的，装甲的密度很大，不管不顾地抬高炮座就会带来稳性问题，从而影响船只射击精度，转向性能，适航甚至安全
而且实际上正前或者正后的火力其实不那么重要，抢不到T，首向火力是一半还是三分之一所导致的都是悲惨的命运，与其付出巨大的性能代价求得死的好看那么一点还是尽快变阵的好。

过于沉重的舰艏是不能接受的 三炮塔金字塔式堆叠 舰艏很重 这一段结构要加强 影响适航性

小船为了航速所以船长，而且装甲防护也薄，可以这么晚。。。你看看战列舰有五座单装布置成弗莱彻那样的吗？

不行，炮座装甲太重了，重心和结构都会出问题

帮楼上补张更详细的图和说明
Battleship 1917 ... March 20, 1916
A preliminary design for a battleship to be funded in Fiscal Year 1917, sent on 28 March 1916 to the Navy Department. This design followed the Tennessee, differing in replacing triple 14-inch gun turrets with twin 16-inch turrets while adding a fifth twin 16-inch gun turret in a superimposed position forward. This design avoided a midships turret that complicated machinery arrangements or an additional mount aft that also increased the length of propeller shafting, but added over 5,000 tons displacement and associated cost. None of the Navy’s leadership recommended this design and it was passed over.
This plan provided ten 16-inch guns, electric machinery, and a speed of 21 knots in a ship 668 feet long on the waterline, 97 feet 6 inches in beam, and with a normal displacement of 37,500 tons.